a person who repeatedly remembers songs from lame soundtracks or reality show instead of their true form
Goofus: I love that song Takin it to the Streets that Taylor Hicks sings
Gallant: That song is by the Doobie Brothers
Goofus: Who the hell is that
Gallant: You are such a Copyright Flamer
Gallant: That song is by the Doobie Brothers
Goofus: Who the hell is that
Gallant: You are such a Copyright Flamer
by KittyKatBigBoi January 02, 2009
20th Century Fox or (not as much these days) Viacom. They won't allow anything that's theirs on YouTube unless it's something official or poor quality.
Want to know the reason why there are no montage parodies of shows like Family Guy?
Blame the copyright nazis at Fox!
Blame the copyright nazis at Fox!
by Choof Koof June 16, 2015
A copyright holder who is so fanatic against fair-use that they have gone beyond copyright nazi when striking users for so much as mentioning their intellectual property.
Named after the Necrons from Warhammer.
A Copyright Nazi will strike your Youtube for showing a clip of their show in one of your videos.
A Copyright Necron will strike your Twitter for posting a meme, GIF, or having a profile picture of their intellectual property.
Copyright Necrons are more cold blooded than (C) Nazis & really don't care who they take down in their purges.
Copyright Nazis are asshole narcissists, but at least are pragmatic enough to realize they need a fanbase to keep their income. They'll allow fans to cosplay or make fanart of their characters.
This form of IP fanaticism goes beyond Copyright Nazism because the original Nazism had some form of populism & mob mentality backing it. But Copyright Necrons are ghouls who really don't care who they piss off.
Warhammer Necrons roam the galaxy to purge all living things, believing if they extract enough biomass they will become flesh again.
Copyright Necrons roam the internet, purging all AMVs, fanart, cosplay, & memes that reference their copyrighted materials, believing it will make them the most money.
Examples of Copyright Nazis include Disney, Toei animation, Hasbro, VIACOM & Tommy Wiseau.
Examples of Copyright Necrons include Shueisha & Camden Lamont (1999 creepypasta)
Named after the Necrons from Warhammer.
A Copyright Nazi will strike your Youtube for showing a clip of their show in one of your videos.
A Copyright Necron will strike your Twitter for posting a meme, GIF, or having a profile picture of their intellectual property.
Copyright Necrons are more cold blooded than (C) Nazis & really don't care who they take down in their purges.
Copyright Nazis are asshole narcissists, but at least are pragmatic enough to realize they need a fanbase to keep their income. They'll allow fans to cosplay or make fanart of their characters.
This form of IP fanaticism goes beyond Copyright Nazism because the original Nazism had some form of populism & mob mentality backing it. But Copyright Necrons are ghouls who really don't care who they piss off.
Warhammer Necrons roam the galaxy to purge all living things, believing if they extract enough biomass they will become flesh again.
Copyright Necrons roam the internet, purging all AMVs, fanart, cosplay, & memes that reference their copyrighted materials, believing it will make them the most money.
Examples of Copyright Nazis include Disney, Toei animation, Hasbro, VIACOM & Tommy Wiseau.
Examples of Copyright Necrons include Shueisha & Camden Lamont (1999 creepypasta)
RoseScape got striked by Shueisha for posting a Dragonball GIF! They're not mere copyright Nazis like Toei, they've become copyright necrons!
Sorry bro but even a massive boycott won't work. Shueisha doesn't value it's public image at all, they're copyright necrons who would burn down their corporation to purge the internet of their copyrighted material.
Those copyright necrons suspended my Twitter account just for cosplaying as a character they own!
Sorry bro but even a massive boycott won't work. Shueisha doesn't value it's public image at all, they're copyright necrons who would burn down their corporation to purge the internet of their copyrighted material.
Those copyright necrons suspended my Twitter account just for cosplaying as a character they own!
by HippyHollowSaiyan January 08, 2021
Copyright strikes are warnings given to YouTubers for playing a song that is copyrighted or using copyrighted content.
A strike given to YouTubers for one of the three reasons:
- Stolen content
- Someone playing "ITS RAINING TACOS" and being an annoying little rat that you want to stomp its skull out
- Your channel being hacked and YouTube having no common sense
A strike given to YouTubers for one of the three reasons:
- Stolen content
- Someone playing "ITS RAINING TACOS" and being an annoying little rat that you want to stomp its skull out
- Your channel being hacked and YouTube having no common sense
by le oof January 17, 2021
Person 1:I made a video but it got deleted because of the copyright system since i used W.A.P as my song plus with porn! Person 2: Maybe it's because the porn thing.
by spicydorito_animationsboi March 06, 2021
A generic and mediocre Oi/Street punk band from Connecticut. They typically write about driving drunk, anarchy as well as a nihilistic theme. And they fail to recognize that songs about anarchy and nihilistic views butt heads with their strong sense of nationalism.
Copyright Chaos are fashion punks as well. They attract other fashion punks.
Copyright Chaos are fashion punks as well. They attract other fashion punks.
Dude why the fuck does Copyright Chaos have an anarchy symbol in their logo? Aren't they all right wing nationalists?
Let's go burn some American flags in front of Copyright Chaos and watch them flip out.
That 18 inch green mohawk will definately get you in with the chaos crew
Let's go burn some American flags in front of Copyright Chaos and watch them flip out.
That 18 inch green mohawk will definately get you in with the chaos crew
by pay to play April 10, 2008
A phrase put in the title and/or description section of youtube videos by incredibly stupid people who don’t understand how copyright laws actually work. The phrase makes no logical sense because it directly contradicts their action of uploading content which they aren't the copyright holder of.
By analogy, according to people who use the phrase, someone should be able to shoot them in the head while yelling “NO HARM/MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER INTENDED!” and get away with it.
By analogy, according to people who use the phrase, someone should be able to shoot them in the head while yelling “NO HARM/MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER INTENDED!” and get away with it.
by cbauersc December 12, 2009

