A girl who is apparently a “boy” but is actually secretly a girl and acts like one, or maybe he’s just gay, is one of those... Darwin is a weird rare name, a rare specie he is to be exact. Extremely weak & skinny thinks they are cute but really is not, looks like a gringa and is a wannabe Mexican.

Charles Darwin, a guy who thought he figured out the origin of life. Apparently, life itself, along with every living organism on the planet originated from one molecule of organic material, created under virtually impossible conditions and circumstances (Scientists have attempted to replicate the ideal conditions for this to happen numerous times, and have failed). He also believed that all humans came from mindless apes, and he tried to use finches on the Galopogas Islands to somehow prove that evolution took place on an incredibly massive scale... using only birds. Frankly his thinking just does not make sense, but despite many great minds in science admitting that Darwin's theory does not add up, it has become the accepted explanation for life itself. What is worse is that it is absolutely impossible to convince Darwinists otherwise. They firmly believe that the theory they worship so much is bulletproof, and will reject any evidence against it. Professors from various universities and event he Smithsonian have been fired for presenting evidence for, or even simply mentioning the possibility of intelligent design in published papers. Darwinists ruthlessly bash Christians, reject any opposition to Darwin's theory and insist that evidence is only a coincidence, and use their power, influence, and downright arrogance to protect a theory that has been falling apart for years. That's a fine example of freedom of speech and freedom of inquiry isn't it?

Here's his theory in a simplified metaphor:

If you took a watch and ripped it apart, and dismantled it so that no piece was attatched to another in any way shape or form, and buried in the ground for a couple billion years, electrocuted it, exposed it to various chemicals, and let it sit, eventually, by some random Frankenstein's monster process, when you unburied it, you would have a complete, working watch.

Darwin though that happened with the first organic molecule 4 billion something years ago

No, of course that makes complete sense. It has to, or else you'll fail your freshman biology test

The process by which, via natural selection, unfit specimens remove themselves from the gene pool. See Darwin Awards.

Darwined: Verb. To get owned so incredibly bad that your ceasing to exist contributes to the evolution of mankind.

First used by Thomas Henry Huxley in a review of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species in the April 1860 issue of Westminster Review, it has since become a term used by creationists to poison the well when discussing (attempting to discredit) the theory of evolution. By adding the -ism, they imply a system of beliefs or an ideology, hypocritically equating Darwinism to any other crackpot idea.

Calling someone a "Darwinist" or "evolutionist" is about as ridiculous as calling someone who accepts the fact of gravity a "gravitationalist," or someone who believes the earth is spherical a "sphericist."

Darwinism is wrongly thought by many fundamentalists to be the "religion" of atheists. It's true that most atheists accept Darwin's theory, but that fact is irrelevant to their nonbelief in a deity. They simply see no reason to reject something that's obviously true (i.e., it doesn't contradict some other belief that they refuse to give up).

A buzzword that creationists use to refer to the theory of evolution. They use this word to try to equate the theory of evolution with ideologies like communism and fascism.

Such a tactic is dishonest. The theory of evolution is not an ideology. Ideologies are PROSCRIPTIVE--they make value judgments and say what should and shouldn't be done. The theory of evolution, like all other scientific theories like gravity, relativity, etc., is DESCRIPTIVE--it describes and explains facts. Such theories are testable by analyzing them to see what the predictions that they make, and then seeing if those predictions match the facts.

For example, applying the theory of relativity predicts where the stars will be. We look at our hubble telescope and see that lo and behold, the stars are indeed where the theory predicts them to be!

The theory of evolution predicts that the evidence will show that humans and chimpanzees are closely related. We look at human chromosome 2, and see that it's virtually totally analagous to two chimp chromosomes, and lo and behold, human chromosome 2 has a fusion site with telomeres in the middle of the chromosome! (Imagine taking the 2 chimp chromosomes and "scotch-taping" them together--that's what human chromosome 2 looks like).