An easy example:
Person 1(Drunk): Haaaa...loook at thaat raaiinbooowww, ittt''s glooowwwiiiingg!
Person nr 2 (Sober): Excuse me, but firstly there is no rainbow, it's dark, secondly, what you're saying doesn't make sense! and thirdly, you're drunk.
Person 1(Drunk): Haaaa...loook at thaat raaiinbooowww, ittt''s glooowwwiiiingg!
Person nr 2 (Sober): Excuse me, but firstly there is no rainbow, it's dark, secondly, what you're saying doesn't make sense! and thirdly, you're drunk.
by Dr.Explain.A.Lot. August 20, 2011
Hym "That isn't how I'm reading it though so no... That's not what you're doing. This is what I was talking about earlier. The assertion that our disagreement comes from MY failure to comprehend information. It's not that it doesn't make sense to me it's that Leviticus IS a slavery and animal sacrifice instruction manual. It outlines exactly how it wants you to treat slaves and it tells you exactly how many animals you have to kill to forgive sin. I'm not failing to understand anything. I think I made a fallacy out of that? Did we ever find out if that was already a thing or not? Argumentum ad Comprehendum? Is there already one that is like that? New fallacy! Humanity's greatest schilar of reason!"
by Hym Iam August 2, 2023