by iiBuggzZz June 30, 2021
Get the Fidget Spinner Techniquemug. A power or ability previously unmentioned by any character at any time in any way that suddenly makes itself known in a time of great need.
"Oh no, this foe is too powerful," thought protagonist as he lay panting on the ground. "If I want to win, I'm going to have to use... THAT technique."
by Anon Amys October 17, 2019
Get the THAT Techniquemug. The self-bumpkin technique is performed by first waiting 7-10 days without taking a shit, and then when finally shitting, curving the large feces toward you, under your balls, up from between your legs, and into your dick. You then suck the shit back in and out of your ass, repeating this movement until ejaculation. This technique results in euphoria, as well as chlamydia, herpes, HPV, gonorrhea, and syphilis. Also you may notice black discharge from the urethra 2-12 hours after performing this technique.
It is told that performing this technique 7 times can result in ascension to a higher plane of spiritual existence, however no one has survived the process more than 3 times.
It is told that performing this technique 7 times can result in ascension to a higher plane of spiritual existence, however no one has survived the process more than 3 times.
“Dude, I’m about to try the self-blumpkin technique! I’m 6 days in without shitting!”
“Bro I wouldn’t do that. I tried it 4 years ago and there’s still black shit in my dick.”
“Bro I wouldn’t do that. I tried it 4 years ago and there’s still black shit in my dick.”
by Rusted Sounding Rod April 29, 2025
Get the Self-Blumpkin Techniquemug. A fishing technique where you put peanut butter on your toe and you put it where the fishes are most likely populated.
by Healthy alex July 12, 2022
Get the Peanut butter techniquemug. A portmanteau of technology and antiquity. Techniquity is used to refer to technological antiques, especially those no longer in use or circulation. It can also be applied to periods of time.
The Atari 2600 is a techniquity.
Most of the so-called revolutionary technological inventions of the 1980s would be considered techniquities by today's standards.
Most of the so-called revolutionary technological inventions of the 1980s would be considered techniquities by today's standards.
by Zweihander-FA September 19, 2009
Get the Techniquitymug. First, you take 4 ice cubes. For a male, you would first shove one up your ass then put two on your testicles, then put one on your "tip" then let it all melt.
For females, take one ice cube then shove it up your ass, then put 2 in your vagina, then finally shove one down your throat.
For females, take one ice cube then shove it up your ass, then put 2 in your vagina, then finally shove one down your throat.
by Xxboomer4daysxX July 24, 2020
Get the Ice Techniquemug. A way to decide if a game reviewer actually takes time to play the game/plays the game they are reviewing. Here's an example:
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1. Take the game called Shadow of War, it was a pretty famous triple A game but there was a lot of controversy surrounding it because of its microtransactions. Big reviewers that don't really care about gaming and don't review gamers properly (like Jim Sterling and Paragon) said the game was pay to win, even though it wasn't.
2. Find a reviewer you'd like to know if they are legit.
3. Watch their Shadow of War review
4. What did they say about the micro-transactions? In this example, you know that shadow of war isn't pay to win.
5. If they said it is pay to win, they obviously don't actually pay much attention to the game/ they never played the game and just copy and paste mix what other reviewers have said.
This is an easy and quick way to know if a reviewer is legit. It works with any game and any part or controversy surrounding it, the only two rules are:
1. This only works if you have played the game you're using this technique with and know what is wrong and what it is right.
2. The wrong side is the more famous and believed side by the community.
1: Hey, I found this new youtube channel called Jim Sterling, he is fucking amazing at reviewing games.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.
2: Dude, have you even tried The Kaya-Technique? He said that Battlefront 2 still is pay to win even though they removed microtransactions a while ago.
by mystique777 May 27, 2018
Get the The Kaya-Techniquemug.