The Happy Humanist Writes "Well, given the fact that Barbie makes 75 Cents for every Dollar that Ken makes, Ken IS in fact a misogynist if he expects Barbie to pay for her dinner when he asked her out.
Also Ken expects Barbie to have a manicure, pedicure and a bikini
wax twice a week. He expects her to be young and
beautiful, so Barbie spends a shitload of
money and time on anti-aging products, clothes and shoes.
Conclusion: Barbie's life is more expensive because she has to buy shit to please Ken and life up to his expectations. Plus she makes less
money.".
Well, given the fact that Barbie doesn't
work the sewers, garbage collection or anything requiring manual labour, Barbie will simply have to deal with getting 75 cents for every dollar Ken makes. Barbie would, in fact, be a
feminist if she believes that Ken should pay for the date since she has a manicure, pedicure and a bikini wax twice a week out of her own volition because that fits in with her professional victimhood as instated by her
feminist views.
Conclusion: Barbie is too
stupid to realise she's doing it to herself.
Therefore, The Happy Humanist, you're not only an advocate for treating women like children (misogyny), but also of inferior intellect that drives this ridiculous and ill-founded victimhood.
If Ken asks
Barbie out for a date, he realises that it's a two-way street where both demonstrate likeable qualities about one another. Contrary to popular belief,
Barbie's worth isn't and shouldn't be assumed. Since
Barbie used her brains to make a decision, she must be prepared to pay for herself because Ken isn't an ATM machine. misogynist
Peace Out.
