Word coined in March, 2009 about who really is leading the conservative faction within the Republican party; that is, the NRC Chairperson, or Rush Limbaugh, ultra-right wing conservative talk show host.

Popularized by the blog Sadly, No, the term "Wingnut Welfare Queen" refers not to a poor person, but to a low-talent, self-appointed pundit of the right, male or female, of the type who have become prominent in large patches of media, Washington D.C. think tanks and the Republican Party, and who depend on some mix of right-wing money, praise or contacts to boost and further their careers. Putting the "wingnut" in Wingnut Welfare Queen means the media figure will be not just predictably or reliably conservative or ultra-conservative, but doggedly and irrationally so.

Many Wingnut Welfare Queens style themselves "Populists"; nonetheless, some some appear to take relish in the abrasiveness and ad hominem quality of their attacks on individuals they perceive as not necessarily contrary in ideology, but lacking in fervor.

A Wingnut Welfare Queen's natural adversaries inhabit the best-recompensed strata of left-wing academia and the leftmost edge of the Democratic Party, with some holdouts on the op-ed pages of liberal metropolitan daily newspapers; they are the upper-tier of the class called

noun, 1. a person having the traits of a conservative, persisting from an earlier time while having been known of or exhibited for a short time in recent history. 2. an ultra right wing, constitutional constructionist, commie-hating, fundamentalist, God-fearing, uber-nationalist, antidiversity, non-multiculturalist, war mongering, crusader, zionist, hegemonic, capitalist, red-baiting, jingoist, gun nut extremist.

A bunch of fags who think George Bush is going a good job. They usually are sexually attracted to the transvestite Anne Coulter. They usually think that Rush Limbaugh makes sense. They actually think that faux news presents a balanced argument. You can usually recognize them by a book case full of Michael Savage and Sean Hannity's books.

A parody on the radio personality, Rush Limbaugh. Often used in reference to a clone of the same. A very negative assault on ultra-right wing views, as represented by infantile narcissism, indulgence, self-centered shallowness, and lack of meaningful dialog.

An all-purpose catchphrase denouncing any and all ideas, arguments, behaviours and/or organizations perceived as being "liberal". Used primarily by ultra-right wing reactionary wingnuts (a small but unfortunately vocal segment of regular conservatism) for whom the term has an almost satanic connotation. The general purpose is to portray all political ideologies not supportive of their own as subversive, deceptive and dishonest.

The term was made particularly popular by Conservapedia, "the trustworthy encyclopedia", and its founder, Andrew Schlafly. Its overuse there has since weakened its effectiveness substantially, particularly anywhere on the internet. Consequently, it is almost never taken seriously anymore by either side of the political spectrum. Often the term is used to mock or parody fundamentalists and paranoid political demonization of the opposition, although Poe's Law may sometimes lead to confusion with actual ultra-conservative

Our present PM . A Mulroney buddy despite breaking ranks with the old Conservative Party .Alberta Oil Industry are among His best allies , afterall they supported the Reform party in masses and didnt forget to fund the party very well .
He and His old pals from the Reform years are often considered bigots . The only connections that I see is that many were hoping this right-wing party would listen to them but the reality is that none of the major parties will listen to racists .
He has definite goals to redefine Canada . Two major examples are 1-he wants the judicial system to think like todays Federal Conservatives / evenLyin' Brian Mulroney publicly blasted Him for that 2- He shows far too much of His Evangelical views . Canada was never meant to be a scripture based country like many European countries and many in the Mid-East . Regardless of ideology We DO NOT NEED TO RE-DEFINE CANADA , We only need a government that can effectively and justly run the country based on a broad cross-section of various present internal and external issues .
Harper and His party are HUGE but not known fot it , HIPPOCRITS . Social-conservatives are for the community , traditional institutions and traditional values . Corporate conservatives are generally what most conservatives really are . Corporate ones are for big business , downgrading jobs , cutting on social-infrastructure , lower wages . These two types of Conservatives ane NOT COMPATIBLE . They are also hippocrites becau...