1. adjective.: having or coated in fur.
2. adjective.: being related to the 'furry' community, such as artwork, stories.
3. mistake.: A misspelling of fury =P
4. noun.:
a. One who shows interest in things that can be described with the 'furry' adjective.
b. One who prefers to imagine themself as more animalistic than they are.

Other related definitions:
stereotype-furry:
Derogatory generalization of how many 'furry-haters' see the noun form of 'furries' as, usually portrayed as pitiful homosexual men who dress up as the animal they like or 'want to fuck' the most, and have sex with their animals. This is in fact not what 99% of 'furries' are like, however, being the most widely publicized, it is also the most widely criticized.

furry-hater:
One who takes it upon themselves to be prejudice against the noun form of 'furries', usually assuming that all 'furries' are 'stereotypical furries', needlessly persuing some sort of apparent need to let everyone know that they hate 'furries'

99% of all furries:
Some draw, some write, some read, some listen to stories, most keep to themselves because of 'furry-haters'
Just like everyone else, some are male, some are female, and just like everyone else, some are gay, some are straight, and just like everyone else, most go to school or have a job.

A wistful looking man who throughout his life had to butter up to the Jewboys in charge of his network.
His coat of arms should read:
"I'd rather not"

I was reading all these definitions as a joke, until I read the last definition. I'm afraid I do not completely concur with this racist and absurd definition. Now, obviously this "Richmond White Guy" or whatever he named himself as has mistaken some other type of people - he probably would belong to that group himself - as hongers. Granted, some hongers might belong in those groups, but people of other races would have fit into those categories rather nicely too (again, Richmond White Guy would definitely fit in the Pitiful category). So, there are some groups of hongers who are cocky and annoying, but most of the honger population are rather nice people who have more or less assimilated into the Canadian culture and have white friends as well as honger friends. They might
still speak their language or say things such as "la, woh, ge, ar" on IMs and when they are speaking their language, but they rarely do speak like that to their white peers. So what does it matter if we say "la, woh, ge, ar" to fellow hongers? White people have their vocabs like "dawg, owned, waddap, pimp, bling" which was obviously copied from ebonics. I have no idea why I am spending time typing this up to persuade Pitiful situations like Richmond White Guy, since they are obviously hopeless cases. But hey, I guess everyone should defend their culture. As a honger, I can speak, write and talk English as fluently as most white people, and I also speak fluent Cantonese and Mandarin too. I don't find th...

(1) A Government-funded amateur flying club (2) An organization composed of prima dona aeronautical wannabes who were unable to find employment in the private sector. (3) A civilianized baby sister of Marine and Army Aviation whose song was written by the "Army Air Corps wives" (you read that right)(4) A misleading service with illusionary airmen who think they are on the same level of honor as the Marines as they drive from their air conditioned quarters to in their air conditioned cars to their air conditioned work stations.

A small group of some who are some of the most hypocritical people around, which is rather ironic considering how many times per day they call religious people hypocrites.
They're also incredibly arrogant, believing they're right and everyone else is wrong, which is also incredibly ironic, considering this is the exact same thing they say about religious peoples.

The group consists mostly of whiny teenagers, such as most of the kids on this site, who really have no idea what the facts are, but believe they're cool and "hardcore" for turning away from the religious beliefs of the majority. These are the ones who constantly say they believe in "science over religion" despite constantly flunking their biology exams.

They're infamous for having no original arguments, always just using whatever their god, Richard Dawkins, says, without having any idea what it means.

Their favorite hobby is bringing up the crusade as an example for why religion is bad, making themselves look like the ignorant morons they are (they've never actually read any actually factual accounts of history, in which they'd learn that the majority of the crusaders couldn't even read the Bible and mainly did what they did for wealth, not their incredibly distorted image of God).

Atheists love to bunch all religions in the world into one little ball called "religion" that they blame fo...

Usually a middle/high class white teenager that finds a tiny imperfection in their life, and makes a big deal out of it. Hell, half of them don’t have anything at all to be sad about. They only hang out with other emos and listen to their soft core music that they think suites their fake personality. All and all they are pitiful excuses of their own species and are disgraces to humanity.

A metaphorical pie (it can be real) given to someone for something pitiful. It is a condescending and harsh item that is generally given out by the slice.

The term has gained noted popularity, especially at http://www.pitypie.com