Hym "Nonononono... No. Not just proving Square Enix wrong... They are PROVING! HYM! RIGHT! CORRECT AGAIN!!! I'M LIKE THE WINTER SOLIDER UP IN THIS BITCH! AAAGAIN! AGAIN!!! AGAIN!!! Do you see!? Gradient attacks!? Like the MORAL GRADIENT!?"
A bias focused on demonstrating that others are mistaken rather than finding truth or understanding. The goal is not to learn but to win—to expose error, humiliate opponents, and accumulate rhetorical victories. Proving wrong bias often leads to hyper‑critical reading of others' arguments, searching for any weakness while ignoring strengths. It is common in competitive intellectual environments like academic debates, online forums, and political commentary, where status is gained by tearing down rather than building up. It produces clever critics but few collaborators.
Example: “He found a typo in her argument and declared victory, ignoring the substantive points—proving wrongbias, mistaking a minor error for total refutation.”
The worst Tony Hawkgame I have ever played. Trying to make a button mashing game challenging by making you have to combo EVERYTHING is just stupid. Even the distance challenges seem glitchy, where you have to get about 10 feet past the Sick marker for it to actually give you a sick rating. Most of the challenges require tons of trial and error and way more patience than it's worth. Sometimes it's even hard to find a challenge, because they're scattered all over the place, and there's still the annoying gaps to find which have very vague names that could mean anything and you either have to gap everything or just look online for the gap locations