holverson
holverson by decoy troy January 20, 2009
Get the holverson mug.
Hooverson Heights
AKA, Heroin Heights.
A small little village that is considered a part of Follansbee, West Virginia.
Full of heroin junkies, liars, theives, fools, and drug dealers. The majority of the population spend their time sitting on their fat asses, drinking RC cola, and smoking Pyramid cigarettes. Everyone knows everyone because they all get together and shoot up heroin and RC cola mixed together. Most of the people who reside on Hooverson dont have a job or a car, so they steal from their friends and familes and sell their possesions at the nearby pawnshop for drug money.
Things you often see on Hooverson Heights:
-People walking with a case of cheap beer
-Used hypodermic needles
-Young children stealing lawn ornaments
-Ambulances, cop cars, and firetrucks
A small little village that is considered a part of Follansbee, West Virginia.
Full of heroin junkies, liars, theives, fools, and drug dealers. The majority of the population spend their time sitting on their fat asses, drinking RC cola, and smoking Pyramid cigarettes. Everyone knows everyone because they all get together and shoot up heroin and RC cola mixed together. Most of the people who reside on Hooverson dont have a job or a car, so they steal from their friends and familes and sell their possesions at the nearby pawnshop for drug money.
Things you often see on Hooverson Heights:
-People walking with a case of cheap beer
-Used hypodermic needles
-Young children stealing lawn ornaments
-Ambulances, cop cars, and firetrucks
Hooverson Heights by JJaySwaggins March 2, 2015
Related Words
HoverDonkey
HoverDonkey hov·er don·key n. pl. Hoverdonkeys
A one-of-a-kind animal; small, long ears, short erect mane; hovers slightly above the ground; has tendency to urinate on fellow posters shoes without warning; a step above your average burro; pale grey/brown; When Science goes Bad, HoverDonkeys are often the result; never domesticated or tamed; A single species: the HoverDonkey (Equus (Posticus) hoverous); Invented by BadMagicGirl of the Transformerslive.com message board for purposes unknown; HoverDonkey is currently the only one of its kind until further reasearch and development on the project continues; Current status: escaped from captivity after remote control systems were damaged
A one-of-a-kind animal; small, long ears, short erect mane; hovers slightly above the ground; has tendency to urinate on fellow posters shoes without warning; a step above your average burro; pale grey/brown; When Science goes Bad, HoverDonkeys are often the result; never domesticated or tamed; A single species: the HoverDonkey (Equus (Posticus) hoverous); Invented by BadMagicGirl of the Transformerslive.com message board for purposes unknown; HoverDonkey is currently the only one of its kind until further reasearch and development on the project continues; Current status: escaped from captivity after remote control systems were damaged
HoverDonkey by Xaxis August 29, 2008
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
When you need to describe where we exist and Universe or Multiverse is not inclusive enough. We are in The Hopversion.
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 22, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 25, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 25, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
We exist in The Hopversion
Hopversion by Someguyyeet January 4, 2024