the.hot.version.of.jesus
the.hot.version.of.jesus by AMONGUSBALLS July 27, 2021
Get the the.hot.version.of.jesus mug.
Hot Karl (wet and dry version)
we all know what a Hot Karl is, but is also good to know that there are 2 variations, the DRY one (when you shit a dry turd in the sock to hit someone´s face) and the WET one, when the sock is filled with a nasty diharrea, the first one ends up beeing more humane in the sense that you get hit in the face with a smelly hard turd, the second one will leave a mark.
I wanted to give that dude a hot karl but i forgot I had diharrea, I did it anyways, now that i think about it I dont think he deserved a Wet hot karl. Hot Karl (wet and dry version)
Hot Karl (wet and dry version) by P. Burns May 20, 2022
Related Words
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
When you need to describe where we exist and Universe or Multiverse is not inclusive enough. We are in The Hopversion.
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 22, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore Hopversion = 1
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 25, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Hopversion by Someguyyeet December 25, 2023
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
We exist in The Hopversion
Hopversion by Someguyyeet January 4, 2024
Hopversion
Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Intro:
Ex. Given a concept where experience exists, let's remove time and limit to experience from the equation hypothetically. Now enter this concept into blank nothingness, what is nothing? This causes me to phrase experiencing, originally, as "nothings on nothings"
Upon originally touching this subject I asked rhetorical questions such as:
- How many nothings on nothings until you can speak English? Type "hello" into the Library of Babel website.
- How many until you can find the formula of this Universe? Ex. (Cause = Effect) = Timeline, Find Cause ^
This concept is the concept of an entity that is all, and not all, but that is already implied with 'all'.
Further Understanding:
Let's alter this idea in a specific manner by messing with the definition of All to experiment with this idea, to conclude that
this concept = 1 Hopversion.
- Now there's All
- Next, I'm going to invent a theoretical option where there’s a different all, called All.v2. They both have the concept of all within them so they already have overlap
- We're excluding limit and time, so quickly and not quickly you could say. They would experience each-other.
- Now that they have experienced the-other, they are 1.
They point is that in this concept, it concludes to be 1 no matter how many All's you choose to include.
Hoversion is the concept that the concept of all/infinite is 1.
Therefore All = 1 Hopversion
Hopversion by Someguyyeet January 28, 2024