Having sex with non financially generous males and poor males is NOT a benefit since poor males more typically GET benefits from government entities in the form of welfare.. not GIVE benefits.
"Friends with benefits" and "casual sex" are not the same thing. A girl with a special sugardaddy friend who pays her bills with whom she has sex with in return for his financial generosity .. is in a true contemporary modern example of a REAL friends with benefits relationship.
"nope. They admit they aren't LOVERS per se. They are friends. They are in a FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS RELATIONSHIP. The benefit is that she doesn't have to pay for cable television or net hookup. But if he was a poor guy ... it would just, instead, be a casual sex relationship with no real tangible benefits returned to her. She'd still have to work extra hours to get a better cable tv package"
2. A physically involved relationship, where both partners enjoy some comforts of sitting on the fence between serious relationship and simple friendship.
3. Any realtionship that can only be catagorized as being between Friends and Partners, also refered to as More then friends