Subscribe English
look up any word, like yeet:
 
35.
Circumcision, is so evil, it may have been better defined by Hitler. It is a verb or noun, if about an existing absence, it is either the or the act of causing a circumscar to form.
The devil killed the mangod and wrote bad deception in an otherwise meant well bible, of verses and versus, it is meant to cure itself when finally rewritten correctly. The arrested development regarding retarded since babies and in teaching them how to read, such as the commandment(s): Thou shall not kill/steal the foreskin.
Titus 1:12 perhaps 1:16 in the bible, explains lying in vain if to circumcision, and sais that all else attempted in such a society or world, is somehow off and incorrect given a pattern of such foolishness. Core rules adhere to, "judge not less ye".., take out of the bible that falsity.
Bush who harbors circumterror, thus was off the mark (of the beast) with his Iraq attack.
by Joven July 30, 2006
192 345
 
1.
To remove a male's foreskin.
I was never circumcised.
by UncutGuy November 08, 2003
1435 282
 
2.
American practice of Barbaric Mutilation Of A Healthy Boys Genitals with a sharp instrument, Causing unknown pain at the time and anger later in life when they realise they have been robbed of the most sensitve part of the male body.
Risky Surgery that can leave the penis smaller, bent or even disfigured.
I Have a friend who had the head of his penis sliced by a doctor during Circumcision - ouch.

A lot of American boys I talk to are upset that their parents had circumcision performed on them at birth for no apparently credible reason.

by Jellyphant July 27, 2003
1947 1234
 
3.
A practice of removing the foreskin from the human male penis to expose the glans.

Only common in the Jewish faith and in the United States, the vast majority of the developed world having paid attention to the research indicating it's a completely unnecessary and barbaric practice. Neonatal circumcision is illegal in a few countries and never offered on nationalised health care unless there is a problem with the ability of the foreskin to retract and expose the glans.

Reduces sensitivity by causing callousing of the glans tissue and if performed incorrectly can result in almost complete loss of penile sensation and resulting sexual dysfunction.

The vast majority of human males are not circumcised.

Boyle et al. stated that "the genitally intact male has thousands of fine touch receptors and other highly erogenous nerve endings—many of which are lost to circumcision, with an inevitable reduction in sexual sensation experienced by circumcised males." They concluded, "Evidence has also started to accumulate that male circumcision may result in lifelong physical, sexual, and sometimes psychological harm as well."

Sorrells et al., using monofilament touch-test mapping, found that the foreskin contains the most sensitive parts of the penis, noting that these parts are lost to circumcision. They also found that "the glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine-touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis."
by Fraserw September 05, 2008
773 289
 
4.
An unnecessary surgery of removing of the foreskin of the male reproductive organ, most typically preformed after a few days after birth. The natural job of the foreskin is to protect the head or tip of the penis from abrasion. IT IS NOT MERELY EXTRA SKIN, IT IS A VITAL COMPONENT TO THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN.

This is done for either religious or hygiene purposes. It has been proven both by science and by common sense that not only is this surgery unnecessary, it makes the penis less sensitive over time. This is so, because the glands are not being lubricated and enriched by the foreskin. Instead they are being dried out by the harshness of friction and the air.
GOD MAKES NO MISTAKES, DON'T CIRCUMCISE YOUR BABY!!!
When I was just a few days old, my parents decided allow a doctor to preform a mutilation i mean circumcision on my penis. Due to my parents unawareness on the negative aspects on this unnecessary operation, they both gave the doctor implied consent to cut away a part of my manhood. The doctor told my parents it would make it easier for me to stay clean down there.

The doctor turned out to be right, but only with the expense of experiencing sexual pleasure to its fullest quality. FUCK YOU DOCTOR ASSHOLE!
by The Truth Dude 3467 November 02, 2009
761 303
 
5.
The act of removing a natural, normal body part, that most Americans think is a birth defect that every man just "happens to have"
That boy has some mysterious growth around the head of his penis, just like every other boy in the world! He should get a circumcision
by William May 07, 2003
1125 811
 
6.
the cutting off of the foreskin.
A primitive and barbaric operation.
I have seen studies that say that there is no health benefit at all to it.
But if there is some. I have a proposal. That the breast buds of all baby girls be excised so that they don't develope breast.
Thousands of lives and millions of dollars in medical expenses could be saved because it would wipe out breast cancer.
Also that all female babies be circucised so that it will cut down on there sexual activity which would cut down on teen pregnancies, STDs and HIV.
millions of lives and millions od dollars could be saved.
shall we do that or do we have a double standard.
circumcision is wrong.
by Deep Blue 2012 August 10, 2009
571 310
 
7.
A barbaric deevolving caveman act, with roots to virgin sacrifices.
Circumcision is so utterly foolish, that even how they circumcisioned, was retarted. It would be much less senseless, to remove skin at the base of the penis, permanently retracting the foreskin, then carefully reconnecting the veins arteries nerves etc., but knowing that much is better to just leave it all there.
#10, on the bottom of page 1 here, has a circumcision joke about short sighted got the sack, but that is not a joke: http://www.circumstitions.com /Restric/Botched4ga.html
Connect the space to work the link, again note the bottom of the page.
Doctors aren't helping there but to pass down an initiation and a revenge of sorts, so they are homophobic and lazy about really considering it, much like when they call STD's merely cists or zits, instead of treating it like a cancer and taking it out.
Lord's higher science requires a light shined from the heart, to help us see over the devil's dimmer deceptions. If the devil tried to say that circ. prevents masturbation or STD's, then consider the Lord's true truth may be opposite. How does circumcision beget masturbation? A pattern of oppression where the young man hasn't the right to keep his anatomy complete and to himself, then by the time he is horny he is still no where near having the right to marry in a manner which is due or timely, if not married he will masturbate. This covers the other issue as well, if not allowed to marry among other relative evolutionary advancement in time, they will fornicate in filthy irresponsible patterns, which will contract them STD's.
Then devil conspires: But young brides are too small to have their vaginas ripped open by a baby just yet, and young men do not want to marry yet (they want to be players and pimps).
Then Lord may assign a wise human for them to reply: That is why I have created to evolve you with the wisdom given your current human population at present, to consider the most unmutating and safe forms of birth control possible. Also, they are of a lower paradigm that needs to be ascended and shifted, it is easy for them to cop an excuse that they do not want to do what they don't even know they should have the right to do.
by Informant August 03, 2006
522 301