Could be considered to be a concept or perhaps an illness or condition.

It is important to distinguish between someone who is just famous and someone who is a celebrity however, the two are not mutually exclusive. Someone who is famous is merely well-known whereas a celebrity is someone who engages in celebrity behaviour, for example, appearing in “Celebrity” magazines such as OK and Hello in pictures designed to show how fabulously wealthy/good looking they are; appearing in magazines under such articles titles as “How I lost 50 pounds in 4 days!” or “How I overcame some kind of heartbreak!” like any evolved, thinking person gives a shit. For Christ’s sake, how insecure are these people.

Celebrities are confused. They have lost sight of what important in life i.e. spiritual fulfilment and well being of all people, and now cling to their own celebrity status as though it is that which keeps them alive. It has become the sickly sweet teat from which they must be constantly nourished in order to feel like a functioning member of society whereas in fact they are a plague on the society they crave acceptance from or a feeling of belonging to. We would all be better off if they just went away.

Theirs is indeed a cruel fate: their status suggests to them importance and acceptance yet they are simply one of too many soulless ciphers existing in some kind of sub-human circle of self-perpetuating self-promotion.
Posh Spice: a celebrity so helplessly self-absorbed that her own promotion is all she has left.

J-Lo: The one human being in the world upon which I would gladly wish death.

To name but two from an endless list consisting of unmitigated sewage constantly poluting our precious, precious world with their own bile.
by MPCmonkey February 09, 2006
The reason why we have poor people. All they do is act\sing\get naked\some other thing that we don't need and they get millions of dollars for. 90% of America's wealth belongs to 1% of the population. If these people weren't so spoiled and gave some money to the poor, we might not have as many bums and hobos and families on the streets.
Celebrities are worthless.
by anonymous January 01, 2005
simply put...absofuckinlutley useless in everyway shape or form. they do nothing for the economy except spend our hard earned money. we could definitley do better without them around
normal person: "sir can you help me i've been shot in the stomach by a rapper, and i'm beleeding to death."
celebrity: "and what...get my armani dirty...dude wipe up your blood and get away from my bentley before i call the police and have you arrested for article 108.376-any attempt to get any celebrity to do anything productive shall be punished by death"
by truth January 29, 2004
A lucky slacker multi-millionaire. Rarely has more talent than you or me
by irene-o November 07, 2003
The least useful type of job there is available for anyone to do, they make money 10x the amount of money in a day any average person can make in his life and contribute nothing to humanity other than giving people entertainment that cost more than the minimum wage for one hour

There are some celebrities that are actually good like people who save someone or develop theroies, medicine and technology to help the rest of humanity
People who get money for their look should really work in a steel mill for 2 years
by messer July 28, 2005
They are full of self-delusion, hypocrisy and attention seeking drug habits. They are spoiled drama queens and usually have absolutely no idea what they're talking about because they're under-educated. They drive cars that cost enough to feed a small country. They provide nothing practical to society and pack-rat millions of dollars all the while claiming to be enlightened humanitarians and giving away a few thousand dollars to charity which they could just as well wipe their ass with.
Celebrities suck. Yeah.
by cerealtitties January 03, 2006
1. A person who goes on "I'm a celebrity, get me out of here", but is not in the slightest bit famous.

2. A person who is payed a disproportionately large ammount of money, but does a disproportionately small ammount of work. (Note that some jobs, fall under this catagory but are not celebrity)
1. Tara Palmer Thompkinson (or is it Palmer Thompkinson Tara)

2. Micheal Owen, Busted. (George Bush)
by Ben Davidson December 05, 2004
ppl who just appear and act out in movies that ppl like following around instead of the ppl who actually put thought, time and money into making the movie. the only thing celebrities do are whine about their mini insignificant problems without even concidering that normal ppl have problems that actually MATTER and expect everyone to care. i might see some light in stupid ppl following singers around, but not actors. if neone can just go act in a movie or get $10 million per episode then all of us can or should! ppl who actually contribute to the economy should be the ones who get $100 billion a year.

they often have 10 marriages per year. they deserve to be miserable.
Me: "Hey, I just created the cure for Cancer, ended poverty and ended war."
Loser: "Brittany Spears got knocked up again."
Friends of Loser: "REALLY?!?!?!"
Me: "Fucking Assholes. you're all losers and you'll die losers."

the only ppl who are remotely interested in celebrities are poor lonely losers, old perverted computer geeks who still live with their parents and bimbos with eating disorders who despretely wanna look like another bimbo like jennifer aniston.
by gunslingergirlvy_c_e July 25, 2005

Free Daily Email

Type your email address below to get our free Urban Word of the Day every morning!

Emails are sent from We'll never spam you.