1. Online news aggregate site where users can submit articles and compose humorous headlines to accompany them. Community-moderated. Permits NSFW entries that would cause submitters to be banned elsewhere, thus the name.
2. Destination for mass-exodus from heavy-handed moderators at Fark.
2. Destination for mass-exodus from heavy-handed moderators at Fark.
by BlueGargoyle May 18, 2007
A collection of internet community exiles, most notably from Fark, who left their previous sites due to heavy-handed moderators that didn't appreciate their brilliant posts to Goatse or didn't feel loved enough and made a hissyfit after the Fark redesign. Forums are a combination of Fark and /b/, and the website format is a near-copy of Fark.
by supdude789 June 5, 2007
The result of a serious infraction on a server, usually game related. The offending party is banned from returning to the server, which has been transliterated into the pseudo-leetspeak "Banninated"
by samurairas March 5, 2005
Being permanently banned or removed from an online web forum. Usually the result of excessive abuse of forum rules.
Any forum users who have usernames that include hate speech will face bannination at the hands of the admin.
by Joe January 25, 2005
To baleet or ban a user from a message board. Usually spoken in the context of LUE. Bannination can result from one of the following:
1. Posting LUEshi
2. Insulting CJayC
3. Posting LUEshi
4. Flaming other users
5. Posting LUEshi
6. Posting links to pr0n
7. Posting LUEshi
8. Posting LUEshi
1. Posting LUEshi
2. Insulting CJayC
3. Posting LUEshi
4. Flaming other users
5. Posting LUEshi
6. Posting links to pr0n
7. Posting LUEshi
8. Posting LUEshi
LUEser 1: *posts LUEshi*
LUEser 2: Oh noes! Ceejus will banninate you for posting LUEshi!
LUEser 3: *saLUEtes*
LUEser 2: Oh noes! Ceejus will banninate you for posting LUEshi!
LUEser 3: *saLUEtes*
by stuvy May 29, 2004
A collection of users banned from Fark.com (usually for being mindless trolls and blatantly abusing the terms of service) created a website where they could discuss (read "sandbox fight about") abortion, creationism, politics and Drew Curtis' alignment with Satan repeatedly on a daily, and often bi-daily basis. Most stories submitted and "front paged" appeared on sites not frequented by a 90% double-digit IQ audience such as Fark.com, Slashdot.org, and Digg.com days, and even weeks earlier. The low number of users means that submission requires a low number of votes to be "front paged" , therefore a submitter only need to e-mail a few friends asking for them to "vote up" their submission, therefore exposing the submission to a much larger audience of possibly 50 people (if it's raining in Alabama) . Users of bN have been known to create websites devoted to exposing the "fraud" and "conspiracy" behind Fark.com, one going as far as to state that Fark.com had been purchased by a large media corporation, and that this was being covered up by Drew Curtis, then owner and creator of Fark.com. This statement was debunked when the source was proven to be hilariously fake.
As an addendum, not one user of banniNation will admit to being permanently banned from Fark.com. They all quit of their own free will. They also have a habit of attempting to skew criticism by voting negatively on opposing views on the website urbandictionary.com.
To conclude, banniNation is much like The Shawshank Redemption, but with more anal rape.
As an addendum, not one user of banniNation will admit to being permanently banned from Fark.com. They all quit of their own free will. They also have a habit of attempting to skew criticism by voting negatively on opposing views on the website urbandictionary.com.
To conclude, banniNation is much like The Shawshank Redemption, but with more anal rape.
"Let's go to the beach and kick sand in the faces of the bannination users. No wait, they're already doing that themselves. Let's get some ice cream."
by Ceiling Cat is watching you flamewar August 27, 2007
by cheeseguy May 25, 2004