look up any word, like spook:
 
100.
OK, The Beatles kick some serious ass. I'm gonna use a quote from the ultra Styrocen here:
"The most over-rated band on Earth. Seen as kinda cute by chicks in the 60's b/c they wore matching clothes. But the media blew it all out of proportion. Now, the new generation is raised, blindly beleiving that the Beatles changed history, because it was beaten into them."
Hahahahaha, this comming from the kid who likes Linkin Park. Oh look at me, I'm the guitarist from Linkin Park, I can play two chords and call it a song! And I don't know how to solo, thus I should just ram this guitar up my ass to make the world a better place. And yeah yo, we need two singers, wait we need a singer and an "emcee" yo. See, that craptastic emcee in Linkin Park is a waste of space. I could go on, but this is a definition of the Beatles.
The Beatles kick ass. It's funny to think how we listen to Yellow Submarine in kindergarten, when in reality all four of the Beatles we're high as shit when they wrote it. But that's ok, because unlike now, drugs wern't used to be cool, but to expand your mind (aka Jerry Garcia.) The best Beatles album is Abbey Road, with the White Album a close second. And I'm sure if you faggy "nu metal" kids would think the Beatles were more hardcore if you saw the original cover of the White Album.
Anyways, no band of today can stand up to the Beatles. Not your carppy emo bands who sing on their acoustic guitars about who their girlfriends left them, or those shit eating "rap rock" bands who try to be original and mix crappy rock with crappy rap!
In conclusion, Styrocen, don't speak ill of the Beatles again until you listen to their music and/or realize what real music is.
nu metal faggot: Man, I hate the Beatles cuz they don't scream or play anything hard and don't worship the dark lord Satan or eat babies.

me: Yes, you need to listen to Helter Skelter, cuz that song kicks ass.

at this point I begin beating up the faggy nu metal kids until they realize they have wasted their life listening to bad music.
by James February 24, 2004
 
134.
Highly over-rated band. Everyone likes different music and the beatles were not the greatest band in history - a lot of people liked them but not everyone.
Jim: Hey man everything else sucks the beatles rule
Bob: Actually I quite like Abba instead
Jim's Gang: Wot did you say??? (about to kill him)
God: Leave Bob alone, we all have different tastes!
Jim: Okay, sorry God
by GRIMEY!! June 28, 2006
 
135.
Rock Band from the 60's.
Impressed hoardes of fans, but their fame was enhanced by the media.
They may have been very influantial, but the fans on this site whe cite them as the most talented band ever are getting caught up in the frenzy. Most fans will pass this off as another teenager who thinks the beatles are oversated. However, any moron can listen to a band with TALENT that plays a similar style and hear the difference.
Beatles > moronic lyrics, on par with modern 'pop sensations' such as the backstreet boys (ok, not close to THAT bad)

Eagles > Equal or better playing talent, and 1000x better lyrics. If you like the beatles better, you are a TRENDWHORE or STUPID!
by pabl0 March 28, 2005
 
136.
Before you start on me, i have heard some of the beatles' music, but i have to say, (with the exception of "hey jude") it hasnt excited me that much. they are over-rated, whatever anyone says, they are certainly not the best band ever. as for influential, i'd say bob dylan, led zepplin, van halen and iron maiden are more influential. i think the reason they were so popular in the 60's was that they were something new that no-one had really seen before. i do like "hey jude" though.
p.s.: i'm not a linkin park fan
by AcesPie March 04, 2005
 
137.
Another band that NO ONE would have listened to if the retro thing wasen't "in". Now you have Slipknot fans listening to The Beatles. Its Sad, SAD I TELL YOU!
SlIpKnoT FaN: Teacher, a few days ago was the death of John Lennon..I don't think we should do work today.
by iwannabeanalcoholic January 21, 2005
 
138.
A band who is really really over rated. Some songs are okay, but they're not that great. I'm tired of people telling me how influential they were. and I am not one of those linkin park fans either. I hate linkin park and modern rock, rap, hip hop, and other really bad music. I love Lynyrd Skynyrd, Led Zeppelin, Boston, AC/DC, BTO, Foreigner, etc, but the Beatles are over rated.
-"The beatles are the greatest band and greatly influenced modern music"
-"no, they aren't, shut up"
by clark January 29, 2005
 
139.
Horrible "rock" band. Overhyped by the media like todays pop music. No real talent, the music is lacking even the most simplistic of musical structures. Lyrics are repetitive and boring. Did not influence ANY modern music. This was often thought because of ignorance but the truth is modern rock and metal, punk, etc, were influenced by early african american blues and jazz artists. If anything the beatles were influenced by those blues and jazz artists. Really nothing special, just a band with the biggest fanboy base of any band ever. And they wouldn't exsist if they hadn't had this crap shoved down their throat before they got a chance to listen to real original music. I give the beatles a 1 out of 10 for originality, musical prowess, and lyrical ability. Go listen to something that actually sounds good instead of listening to this cookie cutter record company garbage that some sick individuals like to call music.
The Beatles truly suck. If you give this a thumbs down, you are a fanboy in denial of good music.
by ffhk1 November 20, 2005
 
140.
The most over-rated band on Earth. Seen as kinda cute by chicks in the 60's b/c they wore matching clothes. But the media blew it all out of proportion. Now, the new generation is raised, blindly beleiving that the Beatles changed history, because it was beaten into them.
The Beatles suck
by Styrocen May 01, 2003