- A socialist leader of the Republic of Serbia from 1989 to 1996, and leader of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1997 to 2001. He is accused of Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide against the Bosniak, Croatian, and Albanian population throughout the 1990's and died in the custody of the International Tribunal for The Former Yugoslavia in the Hague in 2006.
by Accatt2204 December 11, 2013
For all sincere Serbian patriots you will remain a symbol of courage, liberty, humanity and resistance, while for those who have soiled their hands with your and our misfortune you will be an eternal warning and indelible stain of disgrace with which they will remain branded forever.
The Hague prosecution was defeated by Slobodan Milosevic.
Bill Clinton should be arrested and tried on the grounds of the documents and testimonies brought forward by the trial over Slobodan Milosevic.
Bill Clinton should be arrested and tried on the grounds of the documents and testimonies brought forward by the trial over Slobodan Milosevic.
by Stephan Hill September 5, 2006
You people are pathetic. Stop blaming everything on Slobodan Milosevic. Before you start judging Milosevic you should first take a look at your own history. The worst atrocities known in modern history of Europe were committed by Croat and Muslim Nazis on defenseless Serb population. This, one of the most important parameter of the current Balkan tragedy that is rarely mentioned in the Western press, which is a damn shame because no one will ever know the truth.
Vukovar - who committed atrocities?
This was just one big cover up. The West widely poblicised the battle of Vukovar. When the town was finally liberated from the Croatian fascists it was but a ghost town littered with slaughtered Serbs. But the West accused the Serbs and not the Croats for the massacre!
Now to the Srebrenica "Massacre" - What really happened? The activity only proves Srebrenica was a set up. the way the bosnian muslim was able to do this was to deliberately sacrificed their own. Muslims from Srebrenica were deliberately sacrificed. The Serbian Army that was provoked by raids on Serbian villages, the commander of the 28th Muslim Division Naser Oric and approximately 20 other chief officers were withdrawn from Srebrenica. There are Documents that show the Muslim army did not have any plan for defending Srebrenica and that the army of the Serb Republic captured the town with a very small force-200 soldiers and three tanks(Slobodan Milosevic had nothing to do with this). The real objective of the Muslim authorities was not only to create a situation that would allow NATO to bomb the Serbian positions without the approval of the UN Security Council but also to hide from the world the ethnic cleansing of Serbs from the Serb Republic of Krajina, carried out with direct help from the USA and NATO at the beginning of August 1995.
This was just one big cover up. The West widely poblicised the battle of Vukovar. When the town was finally liberated from the Croatian fascists it was but a ghost town littered with slaughtered Serbs. But the West accused the Serbs and not the Croats for the massacre!
Now to the Srebrenica "Massacre" - What really happened? The activity only proves Srebrenica was a set up. the way the bosnian muslim was able to do this was to deliberately sacrificed their own. Muslims from Srebrenica were deliberately sacrificed. The Serbian Army that was provoked by raids on Serbian villages, the commander of the 28th Muslim Division Naser Oric and approximately 20 other chief officers were withdrawn from Srebrenica. There are Documents that show the Muslim army did not have any plan for defending Srebrenica and that the army of the Serb Republic captured the town with a very small force-200 soldiers and three tanks(Slobodan Milosevic had nothing to do with this). The real objective of the Muslim authorities was not only to create a situation that would allow NATO to bomb the Serbian positions without the approval of the UN Security Council but also to hide from the world the ethnic cleansing of Serbs from the Serb Republic of Krajina, carried out with direct help from the USA and NATO at the beginning of August 1995.
by CrnaStrela September 6, 2005
He is a cunt if ever there was one.
He disgraced the name of Serbia and was responsible for wars in Bosnia and Croatia in which thousands of civillians where murdered.
He is just another reason why Serbia is a fucked up country and why everyone hates the fucking Serbs.
He disgraced the name of Serbia and was responsible for wars in Bosnia and Croatia in which thousands of civillians where murdered.
He is just another reason why Serbia is a fucked up country and why everyone hates the fucking Serbs.
by Croatian February 1, 2005
A Serbian dictator. He is responsible for the demise of the Balkans during the late 1980s and early to late 1990s. His "leadership" killed an estimated 200,000 people. Some Serbian revisionist kooks (like the fool above) call him a liberator and freedom fighter but we all know that he was neither of those two. Then again there are Nazi revisionists too...The tyrant is dead now and will never come back. But the false Cetnik beleif system still lives, especially in the pool of filth "Srpska Republika". Perhaps another bombing or embargo will remind Serbs that the Cetnik way is the wrong way...
Slobodan Milosevic WAS (he's finally dead now) a mentally ill sociopath.
Hej Srbi! Tito vam je dao Kosovo i Slobodan vam je oduzeo ga! Budi te zahvalni.
Hej Srbi! Tito vam je dao Kosovo i Slobodan vam je oduzeo ga! Budi te zahvalni.
by Komunista April 15, 2006
Ante Pavelic was better at killing large amounts of innocent people, fucking over the Balkans and getting away with it than Slobodan Milosevic ever was.
Never forget the Serbian holocaust, unless you're in the Western media. Then you can be as dishonest as you want if it makes for a good story. Ignoring a century of history to paint the Serbs as the "new Nazis" sure is a good story, isn't it?
Never forget the Serbian holocaust, unless you're in the Western media. Then you can be as dishonest as you want if it makes for a good story. Ignoring a century of history to paint the Serbs as the "new Nazis" sure is a good story, isn't it?
by DevonTheGreater August 29, 2006