Man: How does a boy become a man usually by dissassociation..cutting off from the family,expected to challenge authourity,be aggressive,and manipulative at an early age..this is tolerated and encouraged by elders in most societies.

A boy then watches porn with his friends talks about 'hating' girls etc...Couple this with dissassociation from family the first cut off point is the mother,to become a man one must dissassociate from his emotions,become distanced from them and rely being a dick instead.

Not much has changed most boys are encouraged to behave in such a manner and it is even applauded!

Throughout the ages,man's identity has been synonymous with 'woman',usually the dominance and abuse of woman is part of forming his identity(in some way shape or form regardless of who the man is ,he may rely on being an immature boy or being a complete manipulative dick either way)his difference from 'woman' is his only claim to be a man..

Someone who is obsessed with women making them sandwiches.

A person with two heads.

look under pervert

PERV!

A derogatory term for someone who is being unfair, stupid, idiotic, asshole-like, monstrous etc...
Man can refer to both males and females.

A male human (?) who comes to UD to write "a woman must obey the three C's: Cooking, Cleaning, Sucking"* but still gets VERY upset when you call them primordial beasts, porn-crazed cavemen and uncivilized Neanderthals.

His usual response is to go to the woman section and write "useless skin around the vagina" for the hundredth time.

Huh.

* Btw, I know that sucking starts with S but a man on UD doesn't. So for him "cooking, cleaning and sucking" is the "three C's".

Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor homepage. "Rule 3. Publish opinions. Don't reject an entry just because it's opinionated. Opinions are useful to readers unfamiliar with a topic. Don't reject an entry because you disagree or are offended. Don't reject an entry because you think it's inaccurate." It is not sexist as it is a view which can be held by any gender, does not generalise entire groups and does not mention any approval or promotion of discrimination. "Rule 2 Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it." So act with a little integrity, for once.

90% are useless, worthless arseholes who vote up and post misogynistic definitions. when they're not doing that they're probably whining their egocentric hearts out that people are complaining about their stupid misogynistic arses whilst desperately trying to distance themselves from that fact. despite this they'll often either a) not vote down male chauvinism and only recognise sexism exists when (shock, horror!) it's directed at them (useless, worthless arsehole) or b) laugh at misogyny and casual sexism and vote it up. c) the absolute rarity on urbandictionary: feminist male who votes down chauvinistic, masculist sociopathy and who doesn't expect people to simply accept casual chauvinism and irrational prejudice because some other oblivious, privileged arsehole who only empathises with their own interests (fuck you) finds it amusing.