Sentient creature only good for two things: money and amusement.

Intellectually inferior to the female counterpart, but has an inferiority complex which causes them to beat their fists on their chests and make strange, mammal-like noises a.k.a. shouting, screaming, bitch-fitting, throwing a tantrum.

Incapable of accepting their uselessness in bed, which is why a dildo is so much better because we can actually reach orgasm that way instead of enduring three minutes of grunts and groans before he ejaculates and we fake orgasm just to shut him up.

This creature likes to use violence against his female counterpart when she outwits him, because he is incapable of logic or reason and when things don't go his way he'll throw a hissy fit.

Synonymous to: Neanderthal, lazy cunt.

Someone who is obsessed with women making them sandwiches.

A person with two heads.

look under pervert

PERV!

A derogatory term for someone who is being unfair, stupid, idiotic, asshole-like, monstrous etc...
Man can refer to both males and females.

A male human (?) who comes to UD to write "a woman must obey the three C's: Cooking, Cleaning, Sucking"* but still gets VERY upset when you call them primordial beasts, porn-crazed cavemen and uncivilized Neanderthals.

His usual response is to go to the woman section and write "useless skin around the vagina" for the hundredth time.

Huh.

* Btw, I know that sucking starts with S but a man on UD doesn't. So for him "cooking, cleaning and sucking" is the "three C's".

Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor homepage. "Rule 3. Publish opinions. Don't reject an entry just because it's opinionated. Opinions are useful to readers unfamiliar with a topic. Don't reject an entry because you disagree or are offended. Don't reject an entry because you think it's inaccurate." It is not sexist as it is a view which can be held by any gender, does not generalise entire groups and does not mention any approval or promotion of discrimination. "Rule 2 Entries can document discrimination but not endorse it." So act with a little integrity, for once.

90% are useless, worthless arseholes who vote up and post misogynistic definitions. when they're not doing that they're probably whining their egocentric hearts out that people are complaining about their stupid misogynistic arses whilst desperately trying to distance themselves from that fact. despite this they'll often either a) not vote down male chauvinism and only recognise sexism exists when (shock, horror!) it's directed at them (useless, worthless arsehole) or b) laugh at misogyny and casual sexism and vote it up. c) the absolute rarity on urbandictionary: feminist male who votes down chauvinistic, masculist sociopathy and who doesn't expect people to simply accept casual chauvinism and irrational prejudice because some other oblivious, privileged arsehole who only empathises with their own interests (fuck you) finds it amusing.