The worst site I have ever seen on the internet, it has about as much comedic value as a piece of shit. It is basically troll central, you will find no normal people there. whoever thinks this site is awesome needs serious brain tests immediately.
A normal Encyclopedia Dramatica article- (insert any topic here) is for gay ass nigger homos who like to suck dick while raping their gay ass whore cock-suckers.
by Laithes June 15, 2010
A former comedy site. Used to be a good satire of everything Internet-related, including itself, but the massive amount of /b/tards turned it into a pile of troll bullshit, worshipping 'the lulz'(AKA douchebaggery) and hating on women, homosexuals, and furries. Now little more than 4chan's bitch, constantly following it in every of its actions. Has been known to cause the destruction of quite a lot of lives. As in IRL lives.
And if you feel bad for anyone that has been trolled, then you're a butthurt emo gay moralfag who BAWWWWWWWWWs. If the trolled person happens to be a woman, you're also an anti-lulzy White Knight because they're all 'asking for it'.
Hilarious, I know.
You can still notice old stains of funny in their article on deviantART, provided it hasn't already been completely ruined by trolls as you're reading this.
"<insert name here> is an emo gay Jew nigger furry faggot attention whore that should an hero." -Average Encyclopedia Dramatica article
Hilarious, I know.
You can still notice old stains of funny in their article on deviantART, provided it hasn't already been completely ruined by trolls as you're reading this.
"<insert name here> is an emo gay Jew nigger furry faggot attention whore that should an hero." -Average Encyclopedia Dramatica article
by One who wants the Old ED back April 23, 2009
A site that consists of pathetic, immature, childish, attention-wanting losers so desperate to express their illogical, exaggerated opinions. Their aim is to make the viewer and internet surfer laugh in hopes of achieving some significance to the people by making crude, retarded, and ignorant articles, yet in a pathetic way, they're articles actually amuse some. Every article has stupid opinions, false facts, and their own references in defining who or what they choose to criticize, lampoon, and ridicule. Funny thing is, all of these hurtful things are actually true about themselves. Fueled by their stupid motto "In Lulz We Trust", the members of this ridiculous site are empowered by the anonymity that they must attack whatever they find funny, interesting, or news worthy.
by XxXxXxXxXMikeXxXxXxXxX February 19, 2012
The venereal disease of the Internet. ED is what happens when freedom and electricity meets utter stupidity. ED is frequented and Admined by individuals that if you met them in the real world you would call the Police on them. It is a danger to oneself and to ones computer to even go to the ED website as stupidity and nerdish syphylis is likely to come out and get on you and you computer. ED is the worst of the worst that the internet has to offer. It has no redeeming value of any kind and one can only look forward to the day that all involved with ED will have their computers shoved up their asses.
Encyclopedia Dramatica: chlamydia People with normal sized penises and that have money and self-respect are gay nigger jews...
by Slim Yukman October 1, 2012
A failed attempt at a Wikipedia parody that is actually a cover for a non-stop bitching and whining fest, in which it's users insult things for simply being popular to give off the illusion of being iconoclastic or edgy.
For every entry that may actually be funny, there are at least five that are simply a twenty year old loser coming up with sentences to fit the word faggotry into while "sticking it" to some sub-culture of people no one in their right minds gives two shits about.
Tips for the budding ED writer:
Believe that the word "lulz" is some magical incantation that successfully shields you from potential scrutiny. Apparently when you do everything that your site condemns, you are no longer a neckbeard basement dweller, obsessed loser if you write for ED and use "I did it for teh lulz" as an opening disclaimer.
Each entry should read like the World's Angriest Mad Lib. Take X (the subject that will garner the most "look at me, I need attention because no one loves me" points) then start with a stupid origin ripped from the previous 500 entries. Swear a lot. Link to no less than 400 other entries, 200 of which should be their lame inside jokes/memes that are somehow less retarded than everyone else's. Annie may! Betty Sue! 100 years ago! *wipes tear* Pure comedy gold.
Basically just copy and past a previous entry, take out the subject key words, add a few "faggotry's" and cock/gay/nigger/Jew/Nazi/rape jokes to it and call it a day. That way, you can rest assured knowing you pissed off some random people for no real reason.
When people get upset, pretend that no one is supposed to take it seriously (at least, not more seriously than you do) and that you know what parody or satire looks like. Also stand by the false assumption that you are funny and that anyone who simply finds the complete reliance on the same five stale jokes lame doesn't have a sense of humor. Also "funny" means biting everyone else's writing style to fit in.
You can be offensive and funny. Comedians do it all the time. However, there is a reason most of the ED writers are on ED. They just aren't funny.
For every entry that may actually be funny, there are at least five that are simply a twenty year old loser coming up with sentences to fit the word faggotry into while "sticking it" to some sub-culture of people no one in their right minds gives two shits about.
Tips for the budding ED writer:
Believe that the word "lulz" is some magical incantation that successfully shields you from potential scrutiny. Apparently when you do everything that your site condemns, you are no longer a neckbeard basement dweller, obsessed loser if you write for ED and use "I did it for teh lulz" as an opening disclaimer.
Each entry should read like the World's Angriest Mad Lib. Take X (the subject that will garner the most "look at me, I need attention because no one loves me" points) then start with a stupid origin ripped from the previous 500 entries. Swear a lot. Link to no less than 400 other entries, 200 of which should be their lame inside jokes/memes that are somehow less retarded than everyone else's. Annie may! Betty Sue! 100 years ago! *wipes tear* Pure comedy gold.
Basically just copy and past a previous entry, take out the subject key words, add a few "faggotry's" and cock/gay/nigger/Jew/Nazi/rape jokes to it and call it a day. That way, you can rest assured knowing you pissed off some random people for no real reason.
When people get upset, pretend that no one is supposed to take it seriously (at least, not more seriously than you do) and that you know what parody or satire looks like. Also stand by the false assumption that you are funny and that anyone who simply finds the complete reliance on the same five stale jokes lame doesn't have a sense of humor. Also "funny" means biting everyone else's writing style to fit in.
You can be offensive and funny. Comedians do it all the time. However, there is a reason most of the ED writers are on ED. They just aren't funny.
Encyclopedia Dramatica is a nerd-run hate site disguised as a satirical Wikipedia but anyone with a half a brain can see through that paper thin pretense.
by Lig Na Baste May 31, 2008
A wiki website for immature horny teenagers/adults/old men who have nothing better to do but bash things people like for the 'lulz'. The articles mostly consists of 'gay', 'fag', racism, stereotypes, porn, and people. They claim it's satire when they don't know what real satire is. Obviously someone needs to get off the computer.
Oh mah gawdz. I don't like this person so I better make an article about him on Encyclopedia Dramatica for being such a fag!
by Someoneyoudunno2 July 2, 2010
A moronic, hateful Wikipedia-style site revolving around memes, porn, and how every other site on the internet is 'gay' and/or 'unfunny'.
Anyone can edit ED, though it seems meaningless as the articles seem like they've all been written by a 13-year-old in a permanent state of nerd rage, sort of like someone trying to be like someone trying to be like Charlie Brooker. Every single article is apparently required to include 'fucktard' or 'faggotry' (preferrably both), repeated as many times as possible.
ED is also CONTROVERSIAL; as it seems these wannabes have thought of this: "Omg! Racism and homophobia will get me noticed! It's so NONCONFORMIST!"
At the present time, there seems to be only one article in Encyclopedia Dramatica that's somewhat accurate - the article for My Immortal, by Tara Gilesbie.
(But to be fair, flaming IS encouraged on that!)
Anyone can edit ED, though it seems meaningless as the articles seem like they've all been written by a 13-year-old in a permanent state of nerd rage, sort of like someone trying to be like someone trying to be like Charlie Brooker. Every single article is apparently required to include 'fucktard' or 'faggotry' (preferrably both), repeated as many times as possible.
ED is also CONTROVERSIAL; as it seems these wannabes have thought of this: "Omg! Racism and homophobia will get me noticed! It's so NONCONFORMIST!"
At the present time, there seems to be only one article in Encyclopedia Dramatica that's somewhat accurate - the article for My Immortal, by Tara Gilesbie.
(But to be fair, flaming IS encouraged on that!)
Encyclopedia Dramatica articles are just a load of insults stringed together in a sad attempt to sound funny.
by FashionistState December 12, 2009