The minutes of a meeting among British officials indicating that the Bush administration was fixing the facts to the policy to promote their illegal war in Iraq. Despite the claims of some GOP, this document has not been shown to be debunked, false, or invalid.
The Downing Street Memo/Minutes document is a smoking gun pointing to the Bush administration, whose actions are worthy of impeachment and removal from office.
A July 23, 2002 memo came forward on May 1, 2005, referred to as The Downing Street memo, which contained such notable gems as "C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." and ""But the case was thin...Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran.""
As Fox News reports in "Downing Street Memo Mostly Ignored in U.S.", there's been little effect of the memo in the United States, despite the fact that it very succinctly establishes to be factually true what the left has been claiming. Apparently the talking point now is "we know Bush lied about the war, likely for unjust, immoral purposes, but we on the right feel it's best to move past all that, and think about the future. Dwelling on the past never helped anyone. Furthermore, we feel that even though the Bush administration is directly implicated, we don't think they should be expected to shoulder any culpability on the problem. We should continue to blame France for things, if at all possible." Let's examine the talking point evolution real quick:
Original talking point: The United States is going to have a slam dunk success, find WMD, liberate the Iraqi people and have a ton of oil.