(c) 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright applies to original written works. Appropriate kinds of work,
including all forms of text, are protected by copyright when they are fixed in a tangible medium,
whether or not they can be directly perceived by human senses. Copyright notice is unnecessary,
but it eliminates a potential defense of a copier.
Creationism has long been the subject of scientific theory, but more-so as a target than a
constant. In the following I will present a collection of scientifically accepted theories and
laws that together suggest that creationism is fact, and will debunk ideas such as the Big Bang.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the amount of usable energy in the Universe
is decreasing. This is because heat cannot flow spontaneously from a material at a lower
temperature to a material at a higher temperature. The inverse of this states that heat can flow
spontaneously from a material at a higher temperature to a material at a lower temperature. This
basically means that the Universe has surpassed the equilibrium of time, and has passed it's mark
of half-life. This means that the Universe's life span is now in decline. For it to be in decline,
it would have had to have been increasing at some point. This point, according to this theory, was
the beginning of time. The proof that the Universe had a beginning is enough to debunk all theories
aside from the Big Bang Theory and Creationism.
To understand my following presentation, you must know that the cosmologists accept the
term Big Bang, which generally refers to the idea that the universe has expanded from a primordial
hot and dense initial condition at some finite time in the past (currently estimated to have been
approximately 13.7 billion years ago), and continues to expand to this day. This theory was
proposed by Georges Lemaître, and was based on Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity,
along with assumptions based on homogeneity and isotropy.
In 1916, when Einstein presented his General Theory of Relativity, his goal was to explain
gravitation in modern physics, unifying special relativity and Newton's Law of Universal
Gravitation. He came up with this formula explaining this theory:
2(distance) x 2(density) / (density)(distance)(time)^2 = (-8(pressure)(constant of gravity) / 3 )
x (density) + 3(pressure) / (speed of light)^2
This equation, along with his stated information, was missing one very necessary thing,
the existence of a creator or creators. In fact, the theory called for it. He had unintentionally
stated that a creator or creators of our universe do exist. This alone debunks the Big Bang
Theory, in the sense that it's theoretically devised from this theory, but states something
completely different by assumptions.
He spent several years modifying and revising this equation in an attempt to eliminate
the need for a creator, and present a theory that the Universe was static, meaning it had no
creator. He eventually presented a revised version he described as a 'fudge factor.' This was
immediately debunked by scientist because it reflected his opinion, instead of a scientific
explanation. He refereed to this as his biggest mistake. Because this was immediately
debunked because of it's opinionated content, the Big Bang Theory can't be accepted due
to it's large base of assumptions.
In 1919, Aurthur Eddington conducted an experiment during a solar eclipse which proved
that Einstein's originally General Theory of Relativity was true. He immediately stated, and it was
scientifically accepted, that the Universe was not static, but had a beginning. Using this,
he proposed an idea of a Universal Mind, or God. He concluded it was fairly plausible, according
to the present state of theory.
In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered that the Universe was expanding at the same rate in all
directions. He did this by observing the shade of stars over time, later known as the Doppler
Effect. With this, he proposed that the Universe is getting less dense over time, meaning that
the farther one ventured into the past, the more dense the Universe would be, up until the singular,
most dense point, referred to as the beginning of time. Because this point was considered infinitely
dense, according to scientific law, it did not exist. This is because a point can only be dense to
a finite point. This means that the Universe was created from a non-existent point.
Because the Universe is becoming less dense over time, it could not be explained why the
pressure of the Universe stays constant, but something had to exist, and interfere. If there was
nothing controlling the pressure, over time things would expand due to relief of Universal pressure.
In 1992, NASA launched it's most sensitive satellite into space. The Cosmic Background
Explorer, or COBE, was sent up to measure the temperature over time in the Universe. Within
eight minutes of it's launch, it detected that their were layers of heat throughout the universe.
This reflects back on the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that heat cannot flow
spontaneously from a material at a lower temperature to a material at a higher temperature. These
layers were described as the thread of God. These perfect layers control the energy and pressure
in the Universe. Along with this discovery came the missing support for all of these theories.
Alone, these theories suggest the creation of the Universe, along with the existance of
a creator or creators. These theories not only validate religion, but also validate ideas of
the Universal Mind.
Now, which creator was the creator of our Universe. The study of religion along with the
study of these theories suggest that Christianity, Judaism, and Mormonism refer to the actual
creator that created our Universe. This is a sole factor the Old Testament of the Bible. The
difference between this testament, and the other documents of other religions is it's scientific
relation to the creation of the Universe. World religions usually refer to cast systems,
suggesting infinite cycles. Their religious documentation refer to cycles, starting with one
event, leading to other events, which eventually cycle back to the first event. The Old Testament
is different in that it specifically refers to a beginning of time, stating that time is finite,
meaning that someday time will cease, making it the only religious document acceptable to
Scientist 2: Don't you know anything? You're no scientist at all. From the second law of thermodynamics, to Einstein's general relativity, to Nasa's COBE in 1992, how can you base anything on the big bang?
Scientist 1 shoots himself.
It's basically all B.S.
Scientist: "Have you proof of such happenings? Have you found God?"
Pastor: "The Bible is enough proof."
Scientist: "Anyone can write facts down and have people believe in them. Just look at how Santa came to be."
Pastor: "You have a point. I have wasted countless years believing the ridiculous. I see the light now."